Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.02.12.23285701

ABSTRACT

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code (U09.9) for post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) was introduced in October of 2021. As researchers seek to leverage this billing code for research purposes in large scale real-world studies of PASC, it is of utmost importance to understand the functional use of the code by healthcare providers and the clinical characteristics of patients who have been assigned this code. To this end, we operationalized clinical case definitions of PASC using World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control guidelines. We then chart reviewed 300 patients with COVID-19 from three participating healthcare systems of the 4CE Consortium who were assigned the U09.9 code. Chart review results showed the average positive predictive value (PPV) of the U09.9 code ranged from 40.2% to 65.4% depending on which definition of PASC was used in the evaluation. The PPV of the U09.9 code also fluctuated significantly between calendar time periods. We demonstrated the potential utility of textual data extracted from natural language processing techniques to more comprehensively capture symptoms associated with PASC from electronic health records data. Finally, we investigated the utilization of long COVID clinics in the cohort of patients. We observed that only an average of 24.0% of patients with the U09.9 code visited a long COVID clinic. Among patients who met the WHO PASC definition, only an average of 35.6% visited a long COVID clinic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Malocclusion
2.
Gabriel A Brat; Griffin M Weber; Nils Gehlenborg; Paul Avillach; Nathan P Palmer; Luca Chiovato; James Cimino; Lemuel R Waitman; Gilbert S Omenn; Alberto Malovini; Jason H Moore; Brett K Beaulieu-Jones; Valentina Tibollo; Shawn N Murphy; Sehi L'Yi; Mark S Keller; Riccardo Bellazzi; David A Hanauer; Arnaud Serret-Larmande; Alba Gutierrez-Sacristan; John H Holmes; Douglas S Bell; Kenneth D Mandl; Robert W Follett; Jeffrey G Klann; Douglas A Murad; Luigia Scudeller; Mauro Bucalo; Katie Kirchoff; Jean Craig; Jihad Obeid; Vianney Jouhet; Romain Griffier; Sebastien Cossin; Bertrand Moal; Lav P Patel; Antonio Bellasi; Hans U Prokosch; Detlef Kraska; Piotr Sliz; Amelia LM Tan; Kee Yuan Ngiam; Alberto Zambelli; Danielle L Mowery; Emily Schiver; Batsal Devkota; Robert L Bradford; Mohamad Daniar; - APHP/Universities/INSERM COVID-19 research collaboration; Christel Daniel; Vincent Benoit; Romain Bey; Nicolas Paris; Anne Sophie Jannot; Patricia Serre; Nina Orlova; Julien Dubiel; Martin Hilka; Anne Sophie Jannot; Stephane Breant; Judith Leblanc; Nicolas Griffon; Anita Burgun; Melodie Bernaux; Arnaud Sandrin; Elisa Salamanca; Thomas Ganslandt; Tobias Gradinger; Julien Champ; Martin Boeker; Patricia Martel; Alexandre Gramfort; Olivier Grisel; Damien Leprovost; Thomas Moreau; Gael Varoquaux; Jill-Jenn Vie; Demian Wassermann; Arthur Mensch; Charlotte Caucheteux; Christian Haverkamp; Guillaume Lemaitre; Ian D Krantz; Sylvie Cormont; Andrew South; - The Consortium for Clinical Characterization of COVID-19 by EHR (4CE); Tianxi Cai; Isaac S Kohane.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.04.13.20059691

ABSTRACT

We leveraged the largely untapped resource of electronic health record data to address critical clinical and epidemiological questions about Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). To do this, we formed an international consortium (4CE) of 96 hospitals across 5 countries (www.covidclinical.net). Contributors utilized the Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) or Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) platforms to map to a common data model. The group focused on comorbidities and temporal changes in key laboratory test values. Harmonized data were analyzed locally and converted to a shared aggregate form for rapid analysis and visualization of regional differences and global commonalities. Data covered 27,584 COVID-19 cases with 187,802 laboratory tests. Case counts and laboratory trajectories were concordant with existing literature. Laboratory tests at the time of diagnosis showed hospital-level differences equivalent to country-level variation across the consortium partners. Despite the limitations of decentralized data generation, we established a framework to capture the trajectory of COVID-19 disease in patients and their response to interventions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL